Last year, New Zealand upped the price for international visitors to its Great Walks. A year on, the trial has raised a shit tonne of money but resulted in a huge decrease in overseas visitors who have literally been priced out of the experience.
The Department of Conservation (DOC) introduced the trial last summer, charging overseas visitors a whopping $140 per night for a hut on the Milford track, $130 on the Kepler and Routeburn, and $75 a night on the Abel Tasman track. New Zealanders paid half of that, with under-18s being free of charge.
What’s the point of the price rise?
Here’s what they were hoping to achieve:
- Improve access to the Great Walks for people usually resident in New Zealand
- Increase the proportion of costs that are received from international users
- Charge international visitors a fee that more fairly reflects the high value of the experience
So…has it worked?
The trial netted the DOC a not-to-be-sniffed-at $2.4m, with a 37% increase in New Zealand adults hitting the trails. That’s the highest number of New Zealanders in the last six years.
But on the flip side, there was a huge drop in overseas visitors. The total was 71,901 compared to 104,189 the year before.
The extra $2.4 million from the trial will be used to maintain the tracks so the DOC can focus its funding on core conservation work.
The DOC plans to re-run the trial this season, but I think it’s probably not too much of a jump to say that prices will likely remain like this for the foreseeable future.
What do you think? Is it a good thing that they’re raising extra money for maintenance and conservation? Or a bad thing that Great Walks have become accessible only to an elite (*cough* rich) few?
Feature image by Nicholas Di Genni
Don’t want to pay extra? Check out these NZ adventures instead